July 2006


 

Building.png

ANSI Z359: Defining Managed Fall Protection - 06/29/2006

Proposed revisions to the ANSI Z359 family of standards establish a comprehensive, managed approach to fall protection.

Falls account for 8 percent of all fatal occupational injuries from trauma and some 36 percent of construction fatalities. Causes of fatal falls can include unstable working surfaces, misuse of fall arrest equipment and systems and human error due to lack of training.

Members of the American National Standards Institute’s (ANSI) Z359 committee hope the proposed revision of the voluntary standards will provide employers, employees working at heights, supervisors, fall protection program managers and system and equipment designers and engineers with the standardized approach they need to develop effective fall protection management programs.

“We don’t want corporations buying one component of the standards, although they can,” says Randall Wingfield, president and owner of Bainbridge Island, Wash.-based Gravitec Systems Inc. and chairman of ANSI Z359. “It’s an entire family of documents that can be used to develop a full, managed, fall protection program.

OSHA standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1) states that “Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level shall be protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems or personal fall arrest systems.” The standard notes that employers have the duty to “determine if the walking/working surfaces on which its employees are to work have the strength and structural integrity to support employees safely.” Employers also have a duty to provide guardrail systems, safety net systems or personal fall arrest systems for employees working at heights above 6 feet. (more…)

Ear Plugs.png 

Checklist: Hearing Conservation Program Evaluation

Training and Education

Failures or deficiencies in hearing conservation programs (hearing loss prevention programs) can often be traced to inadequacies in the training and education of noise-exposed employees and those who conduct elements of the program.

 

  1. Has training been conducted at least once a year?
  2. Was the training provided by a qualified instructor?
  3. Was the success of each training program evaluated?
  4. Is the content revised periodically?
  5. Are managers and supervisors directly involved?
  6. Are posters, regulations, handouts and employee newsletters used as supplements?
  7. Are personal counseling sessions conducted for employees having problems with hearing protection devices or showing hearing threshold shifts?

 

Supervisor Involvement

Data indicate that employees who refuse to wear hearing protectors or who fail to show up for hearing tests frequently work for supervisors who are not totally committed to the hearing loss prevention programs.

 

  1. Have supervisors been provided with the knowledge required to supervise the use and care of hearing protectors by subordinates?
  2. Do supervisors wear hearing protectors in appropriate areas?
  3. Have supervisors been counseled when employees resist wearing protectors or fail to show up for hearing tests?
  4. Are disciplinary actions enforced when employees repeatedly refuse to wear hearing protectors?

    (more…)