1

Culture Change


 As so often happens when the economy turns downward, the non-revenue generating positions are the first to go.  So your company has decided to downsize your department from 3 safety people to 1.  In the past, your department was able to handle the various functions of training, audits, JSA, testing, first aid, an occasional hazardous spill, and more without problems. 

Now you are alone and you decide it is time form your first safety team to help out.  The safety team will give you more eyes and ideas on helping create a safety culture. But how do you start?  Developing a written plan or proposal is a good starting place.  First decide what you want the team to do and how they will do it. 

  • How often will the team meet?
  • Who will lead the team?
  • What will be the teams goals?
  • Who should be on the team?
  • How will measure results?
  • Can the team be empowered?

Presenting you proposal to your manager will help get the ball rolling.  Asking for volunteers is always a good way, but not too effective.  I always encourage people to start at the top.  If you can get the CEO/President or another senior manager to join the team, that will encourage others to follow. 

At your first meeting have a written agenda on what the team will do and how it will accomplish the goals.  Give EVERYONE a chance for input.  I always suggest that different members lead the meetings.  This gets everyone involved.  Start you meetings on time and keep them short (everyone has their regular job to do).  Some suggestions on an agenda are:

  • Old business
  • New incidents
  • Root cause analysis
  • JSA
  • Ideas for safety awareness programs and/or training
  • Any new additional business

After the team starts to develop is own identity, empower them to make some decisions with your guidance.  You can also try some team building events.  These exercises often develop the team into a more cohesive unit. 

Safety teams can be a great asset to your department and the company’s moral.  Build an effective team and everyone wins.



Part of my job is researching and reading articles written about safety and compliance.  I have many different sources (none that I want to testify about) for OSHA, DOT, Homeland Security and more.  One of the reoccurring themes everyone (except me) likes to report on, is who is getting fined and how much it is costing them.  Many of OSHA fines are well over the $100,000 mark, and DOT is similar, if not more.  There doesn’t seem to be a lack of companies or organizations to fine.  Whether it is a Disney, a GE or some small construction company, incidents are still happening and the companies are still paying the price. 

Recently, I read where a construction company got fined over $250,000 for 2 employees getting injured (no deaths).  The company had previously been fined over $100,000 and warned by OSHA.  People have told me that the DOT is now going after companies who ship hazardous materials improperly, fail to provide training, failure to have a security plan and other assorted compliance issues.  These fines are reaching well over $100,000.  Remember the fine is not the only cost of incident.  The general rule is an average incident today cost the company about $25,000.  That company will have to sell an additional $700,000 at 4% gross profit to make up that cost.  That is a lot of additional sales for most companies and that is only if you have 1 incident.  Also there is the loss of productivity, and the probable increase in worker’s comp to add to that total.

So what’s the problem?  Most companies are reactive and not proactive.  Look at how many organizations reach VPP or STAR status as a percent of all the companies in business.  Not too many.  As the economy worsens positions that are non-revenue producing are the first to go, such as training or the safety manager.    Even though we know the safety and trainer indirectly add benefit to the bottom line, it is hard to quantify the amount of money they save a company.

Time is money especially in the trucking industry.  I know there are truck drivers who remove their DOT placards after they leave a company to avoid having the state police stopping them for 30-60 minutes.  What is the safety or transportation manager to do?

Really, I don’t have the answer.  Maybe some of you would like to share your success with our readers.  I only know the problem is not going away nor does it seem to be slowing down much.  Each year the top fined areas of OSHA hardly change.  Statistics show injuries and deaths are going down, but I not so sure that is a good indicator of what’s really happening. The reporting system (if the injuries are even reported) has changed to reflect fewer incidents (no first-aid is reported even if the employee sits out half the day).  As an example, I was doing some DOT consulting at a company and an employee was cut and bleeding.  The employee was put in an office until after work hours and then taken to the doctor.  After a few stitches the employee can to work the next day and was told to sit around doing nothing.  He did not miss a day of work and the incident was not reported on the OSHA 300 log.

Maybe we should look more closely are the amount of dollars fined instead of the number of reported incidents to get a true indicator that we are really in compliance and acting in a safe mode.  Safety professionals are always working to get upper management to support the safety effort, and others say we need the support of the supervisors.  Guess what people?  SAFETY NEEDS EVERYONE’S SUPPORT or there will be a breakdown somewhere.  Just like the production line.  Everyone needs to do the job to make the system work.

 



Safety Online recently reported that NIOSH, OSHA and NHCA (National Hearing Conservation Assoication), recently signed and agreement  to help prevent work-related hearing loss.  The partners agreement is to provide resources, speakers, recommend best practices and more.

Currently NISOH has a Hearing Conservation Program Evaluation Checklist available.  Over a year ago I reported  on this site, that International Safety Equipment Association petitioned OSHA about reducing the level of noise exposure in the work place.  Now there will be a greater effort to protect workers hearing and make more resources available to employers.



What is a Job Safety or Job Hazard Analysis and how can you use it successfully? 

  • identifies hazards associated with each step of the task that has the potential to cause serious injury
  • determines how to control the hazard
  • produces a written tool which can be use to train others
  • meets OSHA requirements that develop polices and procedures specific to that job

What jobs are appropriate foa a job hazard analysis?

A job hazard analysis can be conducted on many job in you workplace.  Priority shoudl be given to the following types of jobs:

  • Jobs with the highest injury or illness rates
  • Jobs with the potential to cause sever or disabling injuries or illness, even if there is no history of  previous accidents 
  • Jobs in which on simple human error could lead to a severe accident or injury
  • Jobs that are new to your operation or have underdone changes in processes and procedures
  • Jobs complex enough to require a set of written instructions Now What?

    Supervisors can use the findings of a job hazard analysis tl eliminate and prevent hazards in their workplace.  This is likeley to result in fewer workers injuries and illnesses; safer, more effective work methods; reduced worker’s compensation cost; and increased work productivity.  The analysis also can be a valuale tool for training new employees in the steps required to perform their jobs safely.

    For a job hazard analysis to be effective, management mus demostrate its commitment to safety and health and follow through to correct any uncontrolled hazards identified.  Otherwise, management will lose credibility and employees may hesitate to go to management when dangerous conditions threaten them.

For more information and to help get started OSHA has a JSA publication available.   

 



Global Warming1.png

In June 2006, The Climate Project (TCP) began operations based in Nashville, Tennessee, as non-profit organization with the mission of increasing public awareness of the climate crisis at a grassroots level throughout the United States and abroad.  By April 2007, a diverse group of 1000 volunteers from every corner of the USA had been trained to present a version of the slide show on which the Academy Award-winning film, “An Inconvenient Truth” is based. More Nashville trainings are planned for later in 2007, focusing on specific sector groups.

Want to do something to help stop global warming?
Here are 10 simple things you can do and how much carbon dioxide you’ll save doing them.

  • Change a light
    Replacing one regular light bulb with a compact fluorescent light bulb will save 150 pounds of carbon dioxide a year.
  • Drive less
    Walk, bike, carpool or take mass transit more often.  You’ll save one pound of carbon dioxide for every mile you don’t drive!
  • Recycle more
    You can save 2.400 pounds of carbon dioxide per year by recycling just half of your household waste.
  • Check your tires
    Keeping your tires inflated properly can improve gas mileage by more than 3%.
    Every gallon of gasoline saved keeps 20 pounds of carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere!
  • Use less hot water
    It takes a lot of energy to heat water.  Use less hot water by installing a low flow showerhead (350 pounds of CO2 saved per year) and washing your clothes in cold or warm water (500 pounds saved per year).
  • Avoid products with a lot of packaging
    You can save 1,200 pounds of carbon dioxide if you cut down your garbage by 10%.
  • Adjust your thermostat
    Moving your thermostat just 2 degrees in winter and up 2 degrees in summer you could save about 2,000 pounds of carbon dioxide a year with this simple adjustment.
  • Plant a tree
    A single tree will absorb one ton of carbon dioxide over its lifetime.
  • Turn off electronic devices
    Simply turning off your television, DVD player, stereo, and computer when you’re not using them will save you thousands of pounds of carbon dioxide a year.

Spread the word!



Whenever I talk about safety with management or a supervisor, I always talk about the “Near Miss Factor.”  Today as the safety departments gets leaner we tend to think less about near misses and more about incidents and lost workdays.  But reporting, tracking and analyzing a near miss can have a dramatic effect on reducing lost workdays and serve incidents. 
 

What is a Near Miss?

A near miss is an unplanned event that did not result in injury, illness, or damage - but had the potential to do so. Only a fortunate break in the chain of events prevented an injury, fatality or damage. Although human error is commonly an initiating event, a faulty process or system invariably permits or compounds the harm, and is the focus of improvement. Other familiar terms for these events is a “close call”, or in the case of moving objects, “near collision”.

Reporting, Analysis and Prevention
An ideal near miss event report system includes both mandatory (for incidents with high loss potential) and voluntary, non-punitive reporting by witnesses.  A key to any near miss report is the “lesson learned”.  Near miss reporters are in a position to describe what observe about genesis of the event, and the factors that prevented loss from occurring.

The events that caused the near miss are subjected to root cause analysis to identify the defect in the system that resulted in the error and factors that may either amplify or ameliorate the result.

To prevent the near miss from happening again, the organization must institute teamwork training, feedback on performance and a commitment to continued data collection and analysis, a process call continuous improvement.
In 1932 Heineich issued what is known in the industry as the accident triangle.

Heinrich Triangle.png
1 Major Injury, 29 Minor Injuries, 300 No Inury Accidents
__________________________________________________

 In 1969 Bird revised the triangle to look like this.

Bird Triangle

1 serious or disabling injury, 10 minor injury, 30 property damage,
600 accidents with not visible injury of damage
Understanding the “Near Miss” and what it signifies can help safety managers and safety teams to lower the more serious incidents.  Identifying the “Near Miss” also makes everyone more aware of safety.  Being aware of safety and best practices will help make the workplace a safer environment



Happy New to all.  The Compliance Resource Center hopes you all had a wonderful and SAFE holiday season.   And now it is time to get back to work.
The beginning of a new year is a great time to do an annual assessment of your facility.  I always consider 4 parts to an assessment;

  • Observation
  • Conversation
  • Compliance
  • Evaluation 

OBSERVATION
I always to target 5 major areas that I am evaluating, during an assessment.  I start by looking and making notes with particular regards to these areas, but also notice if there are any other major concerns.  If time permits, I walk through the facility watching employee’s work and the equipment they are using.  I will often bring a camera and take pictures to support my findings.
CONVERSATION
Part of the assessment process should be talking with some of the employees.  This can give you a better understanding of employee’s opinion and understanding of the safety policies/procedures and their training.  Often the employees will tell a consultant some thing they would not tell their supervisor.
COMPLIANCE
My assessment is always based on compliance with OSHA regulations found in 49CFR.  If you are the safety person at your company, you should have a current 49CFR on your shelf.  This book is your bible for OSHA regulations and compliance.  Any assessment should follow these standards with regards to this manual.  Remember that OSHA standards are written for many industries.  You can also look at best practices to achieve a higher standard.  This is up to the individual company and location.
EVALUATION
After I stop, look and listen, I fill out an assessment tool that rates each area I observe.  This helps me keep my focus on facility and the good things they do and where they need improvement.  The final report is sent to my contact.  I follow-up in a few weeks to help the safety person develop a plan of action using the assessment made.  Finally, I check back every couple of months to see what progress is being made on the action plan.
So now you know some of the tricks of the trade; observe, converse, compliance and evaluate.  Have A SAFE NEW YEAR!

 



People live more of their time off-work than on – though some may not feel that way – so why don’t most companies have focused and strong at-home safety interventions?          
You already know that safety is not only for the workplace. An injury suffered off the job keeps an employee away from work as surely as one suffered at work, so wise employers expand the focus of their safety programs to include the hours when employees are away from work.

While no article can replace specific planning and implementation customized to your workforce, culture and exposures, I’ll provide proven guidelines for boosting off-work safety lifestyles.

When you’re trying to create change, it’s always good strategy to:

  1. Identify the real blockages to desired new actions so you can plan to minimize these obstacles;
  2. Determine and communicate benefits to draw people to adopt new behaviors; and
  3. Create a structure to support the changes, including reinforcers. Follow these basic guidelines to develop around-the-clock safety thinking and actions. (more…)